<td width="48%">kill 'em.<br>
<br>
the question boils down to the extent to which we hold fidelity to our<br>
society. if we feel, or discover, that we are not satisfied with the<br>
vengeance that the state provides (justice), then we lose respect and<br>
ultimately fidelity to that system of justice. the ironic result is<br>
that we take matters into our own hands which increases the likelihood<br>
of the inconsistent application of vengeance.<br>
<br>
from this perspective (as i argued for death for mcveigh) we increase<br>
our faith in a system to keep us from the worst society can produce.<br>
following that logic to the extreme (as delillo almost does in<br>
'underworld') the cold war was a good thing. but much shorter than<br>
mutual assured destruction, short of genocide, short of war, short of<br>
guerilla insurgency, short of occupation, societies certainly should<br>
reserve the right to execute individuals.<br>
<br>
anything less is anarchic.</td>
<td width="26%"> </td>
<td width="26%">Floated: 1998-10-05<p>Wonked by: R. Johnson - 1998-10-7</p>
<p>Attached: PRO: Death Penalty<br>
1998-10-8</td>
|